Activities This Week
BGU Probability and Ergodic Theory (PET) seminar
Recurrence Online
Nov 3, 11:10—12:00, 2022, Room 303 in building 28 (or via zoom)
Speaker
Tomas Persson (Lund University)
Abstract
Recurrence is a classical topic in ergodic theory and dynamical systems, which goes back to Poincaré’s recurrence theorem. I will talk about old, less old, and new results on recurrence. In particular, I will talk about how to obtain asymptotic results on the number of times a typical point returns to a shrinking neighbourhood around itself.
Operator Algebras and Operator Theory
On the values of Rokhlin dimension for finite group actions
Nov 7, 16:00—17:00, 2022, Bldg 72, Room 110
Speaker
Ilan Hirshberg (BGU)
Abstract
Rokhlin dimension is a regularity property for group actions on $C^*$-algebras. It was originally introduced for actions of the integers and finite groups, and later the definition was extended to other classes of groups. Rokhlin dimension comes in two flavors, commuting and non-commuting towers, which at least for finite group actions, turn out to be different. The main interest in Rokhlin dimension was as a tool to show that various regularity properties of a $C^*$-algebra pass to the crossed product. For those types of theorems, one only cares about whether this dimension is finite or infinite, and not the actual value. For actions of finite groups on simple $C^*$-algebras, the only known examples had dimensions 0,1,2 or infinity. Nuclear dimension, a related non-dynamical dimension for $C^*$-algebras, is known to only admit the values 0,1 or infinity on simple $C^*$-algebras, so it might seem plausible that Rokhlin dimension would exhibit similar behavior. In this talk, I’ll describe work in preparation which shows that arbitrarily large values can be achieved (though we don’t know how to achieve all known examples), as well as finer conclusions which can be deduced from the actual value, as opposed to merely whether the dimension is finite. This shows that the value Rokhlin dimension can in fact be seen as an interesting invariant of the group action. The tools required for proving it involve equivariant K-theory and the Atiyah-Segal completion theorem; I will not assume that the audience is familiar with those.
This is joint work with N. Christopher Phillips.